Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)Which is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 100.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is roughly 100.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 4.5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window

Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) if…

  • cost matters — it's about 100.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 250.0x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s 131,100 tokens. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can generate longer responses up to 131,100 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 0 month newer than Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

6 months ago

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

6 months ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is available from Mistral AI.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (87.0% vs 53.4%)
Mistral AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons