Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OSWorld), while GLM-5V-Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.6 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.6 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-5V-Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5V-Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-5V-Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02.

GLM-5V-Turbo is 2 months newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

1 months ago

GLM-5V-Turbo

Apr 2, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher OSWorld score (72.7% vs 62.3%)
Zhipu AI

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and GLM-5V-Turbo is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. GLM-5V-Turbo scores Design2Code: 94.8%, Flame-VLM-Code: 93.8%, V*: 89.0%, WebVoyager: 88.5%, PinchBench: 80.7%.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and GLM-5V-Turbo supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and GLM-5V-Turbo is developed by Zhipu AI.