Model Comparison
Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-ProWhich is better in 2026?
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 2.1x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro — which is better?
Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output
Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…
- cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.4x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 3 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.
Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 3 Flash
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 4 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.
Dec 17, 2025
5 months ago
Apr 27, 2026
1 months ago
4mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.
Gemini 3 Flash
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.