The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro are closely matched at 44.8 and 43.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Claude Opus 4.7 is 5.8x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.8 and 43.4.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Claude Opus 4.7 is roughly 5.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 4.7 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 5.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose GPT-5.2 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $21.00/M input and $168.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.8
#28
43.4
#35
46.5
#20
41.9
#38
33.1
#23
17.7
#66
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$5.00 / M
$21.00 / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
$168.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
400,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Opus 4.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
39.1#20
38.6#23
33.5#16
23.8#47
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Claude Opus 4.7 · 7 for GPT-5.2 Pro

3 shared

Claude Opus 4.7 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT-5.2 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Opus 4.7 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.7 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 4.2x cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro ($21.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.7 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro ($168.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 Pro is more expensive than Claude Opus 4.7.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro
Input tokens$21.00
Output tokens$168.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-5.2 Pro's 400,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.2 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-5.2 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.7 was released on 2026-04-16, while GPT-5.2 Pro was released on 2025-12-11.

Claude Opus 4.7 is 4 months newer than GPT-5.2 Pro.

Claude Opus 4.7

Apr 16, 2026

4 months ago

4mo newer
GPT-5.2 Pro

Dec 11, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.7 is available from Anthropic, Vertex AI. GPT-5.2 Pro is available from OpenAI.

Claude Opus 4.7

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
vertex logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GPT-5.2 Pro

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $21.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $168.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.7
✓ Preferred
GPT-5.2 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.2 Pro.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.2 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.8 and 43.4. Claude Opus 4.7 is made by Anthropic and GPT-5.2 Pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 4.7 compare to GPT-5.2 Pro in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores GPQA: 94.2%, MMMLU: 91.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 87.6%, BrowseComp: 79.3%. GPT-5.2 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 100.0%, GPQA: 93.2%, ARC-AGI: 90.5%, BrowseComp: 77.9%.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 is 4.2x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21.00/M input and $168.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-5.2 Pro supports 400K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.8 vs 43.4), context window (1.0M vs 400K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $21.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-5.2 Pro is developed by OpenAI.