Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.8 to -0.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 62.7x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.8 to -0.8, ranking #1 overall.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is roughly 62.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 5.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 59.8 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
- cost matters — it's about 62.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 13 for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 57.1x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($20.00/1M tokens) is 66.7x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 5.5 is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 5.5's 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15.
Claude Opus 5.5 is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.
Sep 22, 2026
0 days ago
2.5yr newerMar 15, 2024
2.5 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a cutoff of 2024-10-01.
Claude Opus 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (2024-10-01).
Jun 2026
1.7 yr newerOct 2024
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google.
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.