The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to -0.8.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to -0.8, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.8
#334
40.6
#57
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1012.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 1012.0B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 12650.0% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to -0.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 40.6), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.