The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -0.8.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -0.8, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.8
#334
45.7
#29
Reasoning
-0.4
#324
43.2
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

301.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 301.0B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 3762.5% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -0.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 45.7), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons