Model Comparison

Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)Which is better in 2026?

Codestral-22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) — which is better?

Codestral-22B (by Mistral AI) and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Codestral-22B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 0 benchmarks. Codestral-22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Codestral-22B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Codestral-22B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Codestral-22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

20.3B diff

Codestral-22B has 20.3B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 1062.3% larger.

Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
22.2Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
22.2B
Codestral-22B
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Codestral-22B does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Codestral-22B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Codestral-22B is licensed under MNPL-0.1, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 12 months newer than Codestral-22B.

Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Codestral-22B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Codestral-22B's cutoff date.

Codestral-22B

—

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Higher HumanEval score (81.1% vs 66.5%)
Higher MBPP score (78.2% vs 56.6%)
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

FAQ

Common questions about Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Which is better, Codestral-22B or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Codestral-22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Codestral-22B is made by Mistral AI and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Codestral-22B compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) in benchmarks?

Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the main differences between Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MNPL-0.1 vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Codestral-22B and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google.

Related comparisons