The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command A+ vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Command A+ and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp are closely matched at 24.0 and 28.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Cohere · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Command A+ and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 28.2.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Command A+ wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command A+

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.27/M input and $0.41/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#168
28.2
#134
21.5
#179
28.1
#130
7.3
#185
17.5
#119
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.27 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.41 / M
Context window
163,840

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Command A+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
24.1#119
26.3#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Command A+ · 14 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

1 shared

Command A+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is better at 0 benchmarks.

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

467.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 467.0B more parameters than Command A+, making it 214.2% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
685.0Bparameters
218.0B
Command A+
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input163,840 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Command A+ supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp does not.

Command A+ can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command A+ is licensed under Apache 2.0, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was released on 2025-09-29.

Command A+ is 8 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

4 months ago

7mo newer
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Sep 29, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.

Which is better, Command A+ or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

Command A+ and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 28.2. Command A+ is made by Cohere and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command A+ compare to DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores SimpleQA: 97.1%, AIME 2025: 89.3%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%, HMMT 2025: 83.6%, GPQA: 79.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp supports 164K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 28.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is developed by DeepSeek.