Model Comparison

Command A+ vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Command A+ vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking — which is better?

Command A+ (by Cohere) and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU). Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Command A+ if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU).

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Command A+ and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command A+ is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21.

Command A+ is 16 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

2 months ago

1.3yr newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Command A+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command A+'s cutoff date.

Command A+

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Has open weights
Google
Higher MMMU score (75.4% vs 75.1%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command A+
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Which is better, Command A+ or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command A+ compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google.

Related comparisons