The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command A+ vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking are closely matched at 24.0 and 26.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Cohere · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 26.7.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command A+

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#168
26.7
#148
21.5
#179
26.9
#142
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.45 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.49 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Command A+
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
24.1#119
29.6#82
12.4#102
18.0#79
15.9#84
20.1#68
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Command A+ · 67 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

3 shared

Command A+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, MMMU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has 18.0B more parameters than Command A+, making it 8.3% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
236.0Bparameters
218.0B
Command A+
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Command A+ is 8 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

4 months ago

8mo newer
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, Command A+ or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 26.7. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command A+ compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 26.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.