Model Comparison

Command A+ vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Command A+ has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Verdict: Command A+ vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?

Command A+ (by Cohere) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command A+ outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-D), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R). Command A+ has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Choose Command A+ if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $0.99/M output

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Command A+ outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-D), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).

Command A+ has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

187.0B diff

Command A+ has 187.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, making it 603.2% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
218.0B
Command A+
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Command A+ is 8 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

2 months ago

8mo newer
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher AIME 2025 score (90.0% vs 83.1%)
Higher CharXiv-D score (88.0% vs 86.9%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher CharXiv-R score (56.6% vs 52.7%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command A+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Command A+ or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Command A+ has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command A+ compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.