The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command A+ vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Command A+ leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 18.3.

Cohere · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Command A+ leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 18.3, ranking #171 overall.

The models split the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command A+

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #171 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $0.99/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#171
18.3
#216
21.5
#182
19.5
#202
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 4
2 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.99 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Command A+
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
24.1#119
22.3#138
12.4#104
12.2#106
15.9#86
15.0#92
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Command A+ · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

4 shared

Command A+ outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-D), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).

Command A+ has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

187.0B diff

Command A+ has 187.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, making it 603.2% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
218.0B
Command A+
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Command A+ is 8 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

4 months ago

8mo newer
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Command A+ or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Command A+ leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 18.3. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command A+ compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 18.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.