Model Comparison
Command R+ vs GPT-3.5 TurboWhich is better in 2026?
Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is 1.7x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Command R+ vs GPT-3.5 Turbo — which is better?
Command R+ (by Cohere) and GPT-3.5 Turbo (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Command R+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while GPT-3.5 Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks. Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Command R+ is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Command R+ also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Command R+ if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2024
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Command R+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while GPT-3.5 Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks.
Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo ($1.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-3.5 Turbo is more expensive than Command R+.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Command R+ accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16,385 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-3.5 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while GPT-3.5 Turbo uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
CC BY-NC
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while GPT-3.5 Turbo was released on 2023-03-21.
Command R+ is 18 months newer than GPT-3.5 Turbo.
Aug 30, 2024
1.9 years ago
1.4yr newerMar 21, 2023
3.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-3.5 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2021-09-30, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-3.5 Turbo's training data extends to 2021-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.
—
Sep 2021
Provider Availability
Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI.
Command R+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Command R+
View detailsCohere
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Command R+ and GPT-3.5 Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Command R+ vs GPT-3.5 Turbo.