The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast leads the LLM Stats Score 31.7 to 16.0.

DeepSeek · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4 Fast leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.7 to 16.0, ranking #110 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok 4 Fast wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok 4 Fast

  • overall performance matters — it scores 31.7 and ranks #110 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.0
#226
31.7
#110
16.3
#216
30.7
#115
4.3
#209
18.1
#112
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
2,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Grok 4 Fast
17.5#194
27.3#99
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Zero · 7 for Grok 4 Fast

2 shared

DeepSeek R1 Zero outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok 4 Fast is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Grok 4 Fast significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4 Fast specifies input context (2,000,000 tokens). Only Grok 4 Fast specifies output context (30,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Zero does not.

Grok 4 Fast can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Zero is licensed under MIT, while Grok 4 Fast uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20, while Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28.

Grok 4 Fast is 7 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Zero.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Zero and Grok 4 Fast side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Zero
✓ Preferred
Grok 4 Fast
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Grok 4 Fast.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Zero or Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast leads the LLM Stats Score 31.7 to 16.0. DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek and Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Zero compare to Grok 4 Fast in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%. Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Zero and Grok 4 Fast?

DeepSeek R1 Zero supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Zero and Grok 4 Fast?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.0 vs 31.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Zero and Grok 4 Fast?

DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek and Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI.