The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4 Fast vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 31.7. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.1x cheaper per token.

xAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 31.7, ranking #44 overall.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok 4 Fast also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4 Fast

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4 Fast
xAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
31.7
#110
43.0
#44
Reasoning
30.7
#115
44.2
#35
Agents
3.0
#162
29.2
#37
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
2,000,000
262,144

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Grok 4 Fast · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4 Fast and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Grok 4 Fast ($0.20/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok 4 Fast ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4 Fast is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok 4 Fast accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Grok 4 Fast is limited to 30,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Grok 4 Fast can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 12 months newer than Grok 4 Fast.

Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok 4 Fast is available from xAI. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Grok 4 Fast

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4 Fast and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4 Fast
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4 Fast vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Grok 4 Fast or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 31.7. Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4 Fast compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Grok 4 Fast cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. Grok 4 Fast costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4 Fast and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4 Fast and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (31.7 vs 43.0), context window (2.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4 Fast and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons