Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Kimi K3Which is better in 2026?

Comparing DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi K3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Kimi K3 — which is better?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (by DeepSeek) and Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, DeepSeek-V2.5 is roughly 34.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek-V2.5 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 34.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi K3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V2.5 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 21.4x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 53.6x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2564.0B diff

Kimi K3 has 2564.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V2.5, making it 1086.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
236.0Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
2.8Tparameters
236.0B
DeepSeek-V2.5
2800.0B
Kimi K3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V2.5 does not.

Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

Kimi K3 is 27 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.2 years ago

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

2 days ago

2.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Kimi K3

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V2.5
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2.5 or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (DeepSeek) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-V2.5 compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 cheaper than Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is 21.4x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V2.5 costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek. Kimi K3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via moonshot.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi K3?

Key differences include context window (8K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.14 vs $3.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (deepseek vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.