The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 45.7. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.3x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 45.7, ranking #14 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 9.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 9.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
DeepSeek
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.1
#14
45.7
#31
Reasoning
49.0
#16
43.1
#45
Coding
39.5
#15
36.3
#22
Agents
36.4
#16
33.0
#28
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$1.30 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
$2.60 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tool use
27.7#20
25.7#29
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

3 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, CyberGym).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($1.30/1M tokens) is 9.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($2.60/1M tokens) is 9.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input tokens$1.30
Output tokens$2.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1291.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has 1291.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, making it 417.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
1.6Tparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
1600.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

MIT

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Aug 13, 2026

1 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita, Together. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.60/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 45.7. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is made by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.9%, CyberGym: 83.3%, Toolathlon: 74.1%, DSBench-FullStack: 71.1%, DSBench-Hard: 67.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.3x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 costs $1.30/M input and $2.60/M output via deepinfra. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.1 vs 45.7), input pricing ($1.30 vs $0.14/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is developed by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons