MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Spark Open
MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark Open are closely matched at 44.8 and 45.3 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 11.4x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark Open are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.8 and 45.3.
In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 11.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 11.4x cheaper per token
Choose Muse Spark Open
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 17 for Muse Spark Open
MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, OSWorld-Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1, Toolathlon-Verified), while Muse Spark Open is better at 0 benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens) is 8.9x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens) is 15.2x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($4.25/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Spark Open is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Muse Spark Open has 507.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, making it 164.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only Muse Spark Open specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark Open support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Muse Spark Open
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Muse Model License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.
Muse Spark Open is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
Sep 22, 2026
3 weeks ago
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
3w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Muse Spark Open is available from Together.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Muse Spark Open
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Spark Open.