The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched at 48.7 and 48.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

MiniMax · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.7 and 48.1.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniMax M3.1 Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
48.7
#29
48.1
#31
45.9
#32
48.5
#20
37.9
#23
33.2
#42
35.7
#22
32.8
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 5
2 of 5
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
28.9#42
34.0#18
27.1#27
30.0#11
30.2#38
35.3#12
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

5 shared

MiniMax M3.1 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, NL2Repo, OSWorld 2.0), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, CharXiv-R).

MiniMax M3.1 Flash has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2 months newer than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

3 days ago

1mo newer
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.7 and 48.1. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.7 vs 48.1), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.