Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemma 3n E4B

Comparing DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3n E4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3n E4B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.0B diff

Gemma 3n E4B has 5.0B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny, making it 166.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
3.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
3.0B
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3n E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is licensed under deepseek, while Gemma 3n E4B uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13, while Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B is 7 months newer than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.4 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

—

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Has open weights
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemma 3n E4B.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny or Gemma 3n E4B?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny (DeepSeek) and Gemma 3n E4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek VL2 Tiny compare to Gemma 3n E4B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3n E4B?

Key differences include licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3n E4B?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google.