The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

DeepSeek VL2 leads the LLM Stats Score 3.1 to -5.3.

DeepSeek · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek VL2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 3.1 to -5.3, ranking #299 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 3.1 and ranks #299 on LLM Stats

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
3.1
#299
-5.3
#346
Reasoning
-1.5
#316
-5.3
#335
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
129,280
—

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

20.0B diff

DeepSeek VL2 has 20.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 285.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies input context (129,280 tokens). Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies output context (129,280 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

DeepSeek VL2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 5 months newer than DeepSeek VL2.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.7 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

DeepSeek VL2 leads the LLM Stats Score 3.1 to -5.3. DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.1 vs -5.3), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (deepseek vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons