The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -5.5.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -5.5, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
52.3
#10
-5.5
#358
50.5
#12
-5.5
#348
36.2
#22
3.0
#220
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

737.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 737.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 10528.6% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Atria Dawn Preview is 17 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

6 days ago

1.4yr newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -5.5. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs -5.5), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.