The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Eleven v3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Comparing Eleven v3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

ElevenLabs · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Eleven v3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Eleven v3

  • you are already invested in the ElevenLabs ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Eleven v3
ElevenLabs
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$7500000.00 / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
750
—

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Eleven v3 · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Eleven v3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Eleven v3 specifies input context (750 tokens).

ElevenLabs
Eleven v3
Input750 tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Eleven v3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Eleven v3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Eleven v3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Eleven v3

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Eleven v3's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Eleven v3's release date.

Eleven v3

—

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Eleven v3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Eleven v3
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Eleven v3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Eleven v3 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Eleven v3 (ElevenLabs) and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Eleven v3 compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Eleven v3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Eleven v3 supports 1K tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Eleven v3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Eleven v3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Eleven v3 is developed by ElevenLabs and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons