The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Eleven v3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Comparing Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

ElevenLabs · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Eleven v3

  • you are already invested in the ElevenLabs ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$7500000.00 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
750
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Eleven v3 · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

For input processing, Eleven v3 ($7500000.00/1M tokens) is 53571428.6x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Eleven v3 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
ElevenLabs
Eleven v3
Input tokens$7500000.00
Output tokensunknown
Best providerElevenLabs
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Eleven v3's 750 tokens.

ElevenLabs
Eleven v3
Input750 tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Eleven v3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Eleven v3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Eleven v3

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Eleven v3's release date is not specified.

We can confirm MiMo-V2.6-Flash's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Eleven v3's release date.

Eleven v3

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Eleven v3 is available from Elevenlabs. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Eleven v3

elevenlabs logo
ElevenLabs
Input Price:Input: $7500000.00/1MOutput Price:Output: N/A/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Eleven v3
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Eleven v3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Eleven v3 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Eleven v3 (ElevenLabs) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Eleven v3 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is Eleven v3 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 53571428.6x cheaper for input tokens. Eleven v3 costs $7500000.00/M input via elevenlabs. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Eleven v3 supports 1K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include context window (1K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($7500000.00 vs $0.14/M), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Eleven v3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Eleven v3 is developed by ElevenLabs and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.