Ember-1 vs Gemini 3 Flash
Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 36.6. Gemini 3 Flash is 5.3x cheaper per token.
Fireworks AI · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 36.6, ranking #51 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ember-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 3 Flash is roughly 5.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ember-1
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Gemini 3 Flash
- cost matters — it's about 5.3x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
4 reported for Ember-1 · 24 for Gemini 3 Flash
Ember-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 3 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.
Ember-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 3 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Only Gemini 3 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.
Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ember-1
Gemini 3 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17.
Ember-1 is 9 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.
Sep 23, 2026
2 weeks ago
9mo newerDec 17, 2025
9 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.
—
Jan 2025
Provider Availability
Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google.
Ember-1
Gemini 3 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Gemini 3 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ember-1 vs Gemini 3 Flash.