The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to -5.2.

Fireworks AI · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to -5.2, ranking #51 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ember-1
Fireworks AI
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.1
#51
-5.2
#372
Reasoning
38.6
#72
-5.9
#367
Coding
37.0
#22
-0.1
#256
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 28 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2778.1B diff

Ember-1 has 2778.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 145449.7% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Ember-1 is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.

Ember-1

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to -5.2. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs -5.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google.

Related comparisons