Ember-1 vs GPT-4o mini
Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.6 to 3.6. GPT-4o mini is 22.9x cheaper per token.
Fireworks AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.6 to 3.6, ranking #46 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ember-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, GPT-4o mini is roughly 22.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ember-1
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose GPT-4o mini
- cost matters — it's about 22.9x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
4 reported for Ember-1 · 9 for GPT-4o mini
Ember-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4o mini is better at 0 benchmarks.
Ember-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than GPT-4o mini.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Only GPT-4o mini specifies output context (16,384 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.
GPT-4o mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ember-1
GPT-4o mini
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18.
Ember-1 is 27 months newer than GPT-4o mini.
Sep 23, 2026
2 weeks ago
2.2yr newerJul 18, 2024
2.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.
—
Oct 2023
Provider Availability
Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. GPT-4o mini is available from Azure.
Ember-1
GPT-4o mini
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and GPT-4o mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ember-1 vs GPT-4o mini.