The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Cyber

Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyber are closely matched at 42.5 and 41.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Ember-1 is 6.7x cheaper per token.

Fireworks AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyber are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 42.5 and 41.0.

On price, Ember-1 is roughly 6.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • cost matters — it's about 6.7x cheaper per token

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ember-1
Fireworks AI
GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#66
41.0
#79
Coding
36.8
#32
33.5
#46
Agents
29.6
#55
31.2
#47
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$100.00 / M
Context window
1,040,000
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 1 for GPT-6 Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ember-1 costs less

For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Ember-1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Nov 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerFireworks
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Ember-1's 1,040,000 tokens. Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Nov 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Cyber supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

GPT-6 Cyber can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05.

GPT-6 Cyber is 1 month newer than Ember-1.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

1 months ago

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

4 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI.

Ember-1

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Cyber.

Which is better, Ember-1 or GPT-6 Cyber?

Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyber are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 42.5 and 41.0. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to GPT-6 Cyber in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%.

Is Ember-1 cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber?

Ember-1 is 6.7x cheaper for input tokens. Ember-1 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via fireworks. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyber?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 41.0), context window (1.0M vs 1.1M), input pricing ($3.00 vs $20.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and GPT-6 Cyber?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons