The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Particle-1

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 31.8. Particle-1 is 13.7x cheaper per token.

Fireworks AI · Particle AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 31.8, ranking #66 overall.

On price, Particle-1 is roughly 13.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Particle-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #66 on LLM Stats

Choose Particle-1

  • cost matters — it's about 13.7x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
42.5
#66
31.8
#139
38.3
#85
31.1
#140
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
$0.25 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,040,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 3 for Particle-1

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Particle-1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Particle-1 costs less

For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 12.0x more expensive than Particle-1 ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x more expensive than Particle-1 ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than Particle-1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Nov 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerFireworks
Particle AI
Particle-1
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Particle-1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ember-1's 1,040,000 tokens. Only Particle-1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Particle AI
Particle-1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Nov 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Particle-1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Particle-1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Particle-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Particle-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Particle-1 was released on 2026-10-28.

Particle-1 is 1 month newer than Ember-1.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

1 months ago

Particle-1

Oct 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. Particle-1 is available from Particle AI.

Ember-1

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Particle-1

particle-ai logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Particle-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Particle-1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Particle-1.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Particle-1?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 31.8. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Particle-1 is made by Particle AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Particle-1 in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Particle-1 scores GPQA: 90.4%, BabyVision: 89.2%, MMLU: 86.1%.

Is Ember-1 cheaper than Particle-1?

Particle-1 is 12.0x cheaper for input tokens. Ember-1 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via fireworks. Particle-1 costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via particle-ai.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Particle-1?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Particle-1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Particle-1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 31.8), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Particle-1?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Particle-1 is developed by Particle AI.