The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Grok-4 Heavy

Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavy are closely matched at 43.1 and 40.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Fireworks AI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavy are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.1 and 40.6.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.1
#51
40.6
#66
38.6
#72
38.9
#69
37.0
#22
17.6
#128
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 6 for Grok-4 Heavy

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavydon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Grok-4 Heavy can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Ember-1's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

Grok-4 Heavy

—

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.

Ember-1

—

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavy side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Grok-4 Heavy
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Grok-4 Heavy.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Grok-4 Heavy?

Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavy are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.1 and 40.6. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Grok-4 Heavy in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 40.6), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI.