The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to -5.7. Jamba 1.5 Mini is 24.0x cheaper per token.

Fireworks AI · AI21 Labs · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to -5.7, ranking #51 overall.

On price, Jamba 1.5 Mini is roughly 24.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini

  • cost matters — it's about 24.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.1
#51
-5.7
#375
38.6
#71
-5.6
#366
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
1,040,000
256,144

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 8 for Jamba 1.5 Mini

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Jamba 1.5 Minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Jamba 1.5 Mini costs less

For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x more expensive than Jamba 1.5 Mini ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than Jamba 1.5 Mini ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than Jamba 1.5 Mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerFireworks
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2728.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2728.0B more parameters than Jamba 1.5 Mini, making it 5246.2% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
52.0Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
52.0B
Jamba 1.5 Mini

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Jamba 1.5 Mini's 256,144 tokens. Only Jamba 1.5 Mini specifies output context (256,144 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input256,144 tokens
Output256,144 tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Jamba 1.5 Mini uses Jamba Open Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Jamba 1.5 Mini was released on 2024-08-22.

Ember-1 is 25 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Mini.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

2.1yr newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini

Aug 22, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Mini's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.

Ember-1

—

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Mar 2024

Provider Availability

Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. Jamba 1.5 Mini is available from Bedrock, Google.

Ember-1

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Jamba 1.5 Mini

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Jamba 1.5 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Jamba 1.5 Mini.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to -5.7. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Jamba 1.5 Mini is made by AI21 Labs. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Jamba 1.5 Mini in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Jamba 1.5 Mini scores ARC-C: 85.7%, GSM8k: 75.8%, MMLU: 69.7%, TruthfulQA: 54.1%, Arena Hard: 46.1%.

Is Ember-1 cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Jamba 1.5 Mini is 15.0x cheaper for input tokens. Ember-1 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via fireworks. Jamba 1.5 Mini costs $0.20/M input and $0.40/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Jamba 1.5 Mini supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs -5.7), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Jamba Open Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Jamba 1.5 Mini is developed by AI21 Labs.