Ember-1 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Ember-1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched at 42.3 and 48.7 on the LLM Stats Score. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 22.9x cheaper per token.
Fireworks AI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ember-1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 42.3 and 48.7.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ember-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 22.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ember-1
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- cost matters — it's about 22.9x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
4 reported for Ember-1 · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Ember-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.
Ember-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3.1 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ember-1
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 1 month newer than Ember-1.
Sep 23, 2026
3 weeks ago
Oct 19, 2026
1 days ago
3w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.
Ember-1
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ember-1 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.