The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 21.8.

Fireworks AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 21.8, ranking #65 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ember-1 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.3 and ranks #65 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ember-1
Fireworks AI
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.3
#65
21.8
#203
Reasoning
38.7
#77
19.6
#216
Coding
35.9
#28
2.8
#244
Agents
28.6
#55
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ember-1
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Tool use
16.1#98
-2.2#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

2 shared

Ember-1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ember-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2776.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2776.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 69400.0% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 1 month newer than Ember-1.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

3 weeks ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

4 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Ember-1 or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 21.8. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.3 vs 21.8), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons