The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 3.6.

Fireworks AI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 3.6, ranking #51 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ember-1
Fireworks AI
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.1
#51
3.6
#324
Reasoning
38.6
#71
3.5
#316
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 6 for Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2766.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2766.0B more parameters than Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512), making it 19757.1% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
14.0Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
14.0B
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Ember-1 is 10 months newer than Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512).

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

9mo newer
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512).

Which is better, Ember-1 or Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 3.6. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) scores MMLU-Redux: 82.0%, MMLU: 79.4%, TriviaQA: 74.9%, Multilingual MMLU: 74.2%, MATH (CoT): 67.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 3.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons