The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs o1-mini

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 10.0. o1-mini is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Fireworks AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 10.0, ranking #51 overall.

On price, o1-mini is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose o1-mini

  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.1
#51
10.0
#282
38.6
#71
10.3
#276
37.0
#22
14.3
#148
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$12.00 / M
Context window
1,040,000
128,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 6 for o1-mini

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and o1-minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

o1-mini costs less

For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) costs the same as o1-mini ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than o1-mini ($12.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than o1-mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerFireworks
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to o1-mini's 128,000 tokens. Only o1-mini specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12.

Ember-1 is 25 months newer than o1-mini.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

2.0yr newer
o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. o1-mini is available from OpenAI, Azure.

Ember-1

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

o1-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $3.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $13.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and o1-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
o1-mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs o1-mini.

Which is better, Ember-1 or o1-mini?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 10.0. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and o1-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to o1-mini in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%.

Is Ember-1 cheaper than o1-mini?

Both models cost $3.00 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and o1-mini?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and o1-mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and o1-mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 10.0), context window (1.0M vs 128K). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and o1-mini?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and o1-mini is developed by OpenAI.