The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 23.5.

Fireworks AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 23.5, ranking #51 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.1
#51
23.5
#189
38.6
#72
24.6
#170
29.7
#44
12.7
#112
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 47 for Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2747.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2747.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 8324.2% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Ember-1 is 12 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.0yr newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 23.5. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 23.5), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.