The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Ember-1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched at 43.1 and 48.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Fireworks AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.1 and 48.3.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ember-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.1
#51
48.3
#27
38.6
#71
48.4
#20
37.0
#22
34.1
#36
29.7
#44
33.2
#29
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ember-1
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
15.9#94
29.1#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

1 shared

Ember-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ember-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2655.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2655.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, making it 2124.0% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Ember-1 is 1 month newer than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

4w newer
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Ember-1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.1 and 48.3. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 48.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.