ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to -13.4. ERNIE 4.5 is 3.5x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.4 to -13.4, ranking #39 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, ERNIE 4.5 is roughly 3.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.1 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 4.5

cost matters — it's about 3.5x cheaper per token

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

overall performance matters — it scores 43.4 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: ERNIE 4.5

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

-13.4

#368 · 20 evals

43.4

#39 · 21 evals

Best

Reasoning

-13.4

#362 · 20 evals

45.0

#29 · 18 evals

Best

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

0 of 1

1 of 1

Best

Input price

$0.40 / M

Best

$2.00 / M

Output price

$4.00 / M

Best

$12.00 / M

Context window

128,000

1,000,000

Best

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared

Index

ERNIE 4.5

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Math

-16.3#327 · 8 evals

42.4#5 · 4 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for ERNIE 4.5 · 20 for Gemini 3.1 Pro

1 shared

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 4.5 costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.1 Pro is more expensive than ERNIE 4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

ERNIE 4.5

Input tokens$0.40

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerNovita

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Input tokens$2.00

Output tokens$12.00

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.1 Pro accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while ERNIE 4.5 is limited to 65,536 tokens.

ERNIE 4.5

Input128,000 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output1,000,000 tokens

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 4.5 does not.

Gemini 3.1 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is 8 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

6 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

—

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. Gemini 3.1 Pro is available from DeepInfra, Google.

ERNIE 4.5

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 4.5

✓ Preferred

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to -13.4. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 4.5 compare to Gemini 3.1 Pro in benchmarks?

ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%.

Is ERNIE 4.5 cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro?

ERNIE 4.5 is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output via novita. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-13.4 vs 43.4), context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google.

ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro