The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.6 to -13.4. ERNIE 4.5 is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.6 to -13.4, ranking #16 overall.

On price, ERNIE 4.5 is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 4.5

  • cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-13.4
#368
50.6
#16
-13.4
#362
46.9
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.40 / M
$0.75 / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
128,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for ERNIE 4.5 · 13 for Gemini 3.8 Flash

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 4.5 costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.9x cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than ERNIE 4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 4.5 does not.

Gemini 3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 14 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google.

ERNIE 4.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Gemini 3.8 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 4.5
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.6 to -13.4. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 4.5 compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is ERNIE 4.5 cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash?

ERNIE 4.5 is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output via novita. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-13.4 vs 50.6), context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.75/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google.