The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.1 to -13.4.

Baidu · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.1 to -13.4, ranking #52 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 4.5

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.1 and ranks #52 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 4.5
Baidu
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-13.4
#368
41.1
#52
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for ERNIE 4.5 · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 14 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 4.5
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.1 to -13.4. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 4.5 compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-13.4 vs 41.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons