ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 25.0. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Baidu · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 25.0, ranking #13 overall.
On price, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
- overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 31 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and MiMo-V2.5-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).
For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 743.2B more parameters than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview, making it 265.4% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is limited to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 7 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Nov 11, 2026
1 days ago
6mo newerApr 27, 2026
6 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.