MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Muse Ember
Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 25.0. Muse Ember is 2.7x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 25.0, ranking #47 overall.
On price, Muse Ember is roughly 2.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Muse Ember
- overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 2.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
31 reported for MiMo-V2.5-Pro · 6 for Muse Ember
MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Muse Emberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 4.3x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more expensive than Muse Ember.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Ember can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Muse Ember supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.
Muse Ember can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Muse Ember
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Muse Ember uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27, while Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09.
Muse Ember is 7 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Apr 27, 2026
6 months ago
Nov 9, 2026
3 days ago
6mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita. Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Muse Ember
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Muse Ember side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Muse Ember.