The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 6.6.

Baidu · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 6.6, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
6.6
#336
Reasoning
50.7
#12
2.6
#347
Agents
38.5
#11
-3.5
#224
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

271.7B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 271.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 3277.6% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 22 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

1.8yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 6.6. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 6.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons