The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -5.2.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -5.2, ranking #156 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.2
#340
24.0
#156
Reasoning
-7.8
#339
21.8
#165
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Context window
32,760
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 1.0 Pro
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Math
-1.4#294
25.6#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Gemini 1.0 Pro · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

1 shared

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies input context (32,760 tokens). Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.0 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -5.2. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.2 vs 24.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.0 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons