The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -5.2. Qwen3.8 Flash is 3.3x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -5.2, ranking #16 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3.8 Flash is roughly 3.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 3.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google
Qwen3.8 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.2
#340
49.6
#16
Reasoning
-7.8
#339
49.2
#16
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.50 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
32,760
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Qwen3.8 Flash
Math
-1.4#294
32.6#55
Vision
-8.3#196
34.4#13
Multimodal
-5.9#157
36.2#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Gemini 1.0 Pro · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

1 shared

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens) is 3.2x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.47/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.0 Pro is more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.47
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.8 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

Qwen3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8 Flash is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

5 days ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Qwen3.8 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Qwen3.8 Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google. Qwen3.8 Flash is available from Novita.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Qwen3.8 Flash

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.47/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -5.2. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google. Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.47/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.2 vs 49.6), context window (33K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons