The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to -0.7. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Google · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.3 to -0.7, ranking #39 overall.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.3 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.7
#329
43.3
#39
Reasoning
-0.3
#320
44.7
#32
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.07 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerGoogle
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

116.0B diff

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has 116.0B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 1450.0% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 30 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

5 days ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to -0.7. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output via google. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.7 vs 43.3), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.07 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons