The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched at 16.5 and 22.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 16.5 and 22.1.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.5
#243
22.1
#202
16.8
#236
19.8
#213
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 21 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.7 years ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 16.5 and 22.1. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.5 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.