The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 43.0. Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1.8x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 43.0, ranking #29 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 3.1 Pro is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.0
#51
47.9
#29
Reasoning
44.7
#37
33.1
#108
Coding
30.1
#55
38.9
#18
Agents
23.8
#63
34.1
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$2.00 / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Muse Wonder
Vision
30.9#32
25.4#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Gemini 3.1 Pro · 16 for Muse Wonder

1 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Wonder is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).

Muse Wonder significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro's 1,000,000 tokens. Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 8 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

7 months ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Muse Wonder

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.1 Pro is available from DeepInfra, Google. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 43.0. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output via deepinfra. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 47.9), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($2.00 vs $4.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons