The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 43.0.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 43.0, ranking #13 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder Full wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.0
#51
52.1
#13
Reasoning
44.7
#37
38.4
#71
Coding
30.1
#55
41.5
#8
Agents
23.8
#63
38.5
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Muse Wonder Full
Vision
30.9#32
31.7#28
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Gemini 3.1 Pro · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

1 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Wonder Full is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).

Muse Wonder Full significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 8 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

7 months ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Muse Wonder Full

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 43.0. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full?

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder Full supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 52.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons