The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Comparing Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Gemini 3.8 Flash is roughly 3.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 3.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.75 / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe · 13 for Gemini 3.8 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe ($2.00/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe ($12.00/1M tokens) is 3.2x more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe was released on 2026-08-26, while Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 0 month newer than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Aug 26, 2026

1 weeks ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

3 days ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemini 3.5 Transcribe's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.5 Transcribe's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is available from Google. Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M

Gemini 3.8 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Transcribe vs Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe (Google) and Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.5 Transcribe compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe scores FLEURS: 95.0%. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is Gemini 3.5 Transcribe cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output via google. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Key differences include input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.75/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.